- Tue Dec 02, 2014 1:31 am
So to me that is what I find kind of funny, that doesn't seem consistent or fair, if you truly want to be an advocate. In other words, it is selective for particular non-human existing creature that are more important, more intelligent, more emotional? What fits the criteria exactly? I agree there are certain animals that are more intelligent, is that the only reason why it is more horrendous to fly over an elephant verse stepping on a spider about to enter my house?
If members are just worried about image and do not want to risk the loss of a place to fly, that makes sense but seems kind of political. Like you are exploiting animals, just to make an appearance for the sake of saving a site to fly.
"I'm kind of a big deal....People know me."